Obama EPA withholding evidence against human caused global warming

Obama's EPA has decided to withhold a report questioning global warming. They have a 98 page report that was co-authored by an EPA analyst by the name of Alan Carlin. It was said in the report that regulation of carbon dioxide will not reduce global warning. It also said the EPA information they were using was out of date and the worst of all, while carbon dioxide levels have increased, global temps have decreased.

Carlin was ordered to stop working on the project. Watch this blog or the non-liberal news to see when he will be forced to retire.

Sonia Sotomayor is found to racist, again.

Obama the Magnificent (more commonly called the "bonehead," mostly by other countries' heads of state, recently nominated Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court. Before today, she had had 3 out of 5 cases overturned by the Supreme Court. Today she goes 4 for 6. Not so good for one that says she is smarter than old white guy judges. It's no wonder the Democrats want her as a judge as they are looking for those that will change the laws, not just interpret them.

Then the crazy Obama spun this around. He said it proves she's not a racist. The case was about white firefighters that complained they didn't get promotions, because the test they were given was somehow anti-black and anti-minority. Only white guys got high enough scores to be promoted, so the city they worked for thru out the tests. The test has not been made public. I wonder what the questions were?

1. Who was the head of the KKK in 1970?

a. Some guy
b. some person
c. some human
d. some racist, old, white, pig, jerk, a-hole, whitey, honky guy.

2. Who makes a better Supreme Court Judge?

a. An old white guy
b. An old white woman
c. a male
d. a female Puerto Rican

3. When fighting a fire, who do you rescue first?

a. An old white guy
b. a dog
c. a cat
d. A female Puerto Rican Judge

Anyway, despite Obama the dumbificent, this ruling against her ruling shows she's even more racist that we though.

Houses passed large tax increase

Today the House passed a bill, that by percentage, will raise taxes much more on the poor than any other group. It is a global warming bill that will increase the costs for energy in all sectors unless you can afford to put up several wind turbines and photovoltaic cells. Since the poor still have to have gas and electricity, the costs will be enormous to them. The rich can afford it.

The new democrats' slogan is SCREW THE POOR!

20% of the Democrats voted against the bill.

Obama data shows stimulus failed

A recently released graph from Obama's financial group shows that the stimulus did NOTHING to help the economy. It shows 3 lines: 1 is the unemployment rate without the stimulus, one is with the stimulus, and then another is actual unemployment numbers. Both of the first lines show unemployment leveling out starting last month and going down 3Q of 2009. However the real data shows the rate almost going straight up. There is not even the slightest hint of it leveling out. 100% of our money Obama blew, helped 0%!

Obama sets up question for press conference

Once again Obama has proven he's not so smart after all. Proof has been presented that at least one question was staged in today's news conference. The WH contacted a Huffington Post reporter to let them know they would be called upon to ask a question about Iran, which they obliged, being another one of the Obamalaide drinking MSM outlets.

NYT the traitor

If the New York Times were a person, they'd be electrocuted for treason. For 7 months they kept secret that a reporter of theirs was kidnapped by the Taliban.

Over the years, the NYT had told of government secrets that have endangered the lives of our heroic soldiers. In 2008, they even told the name of the CIA person that got Khalid Shaikh Mohammed to talk, and because of that, him and his family fear for their lives.

So now the NYT has proven that the armed forces and those trying to keep the USA safe are worthless, but 1 of their reporters is the most important person in the world.

NYT. A sad representative of a dirty rag.

Polls

A new NYT/CBS poll about Obama's Healthcare scheme was done by polling twice as many Obama voters than McCain voters. A NYT's editor's comment about it?

I apppreciate your question about the measure on the poll of respondents' vote in the last presidential election. Historically, our polls and others have found that respondents do not always accurately recall who they voted for in the past and much depends on the popularity of whoever is living in the White House. There was quite a good discussion of this phenomenon on Slate recently, which you might want to take a look at. We use the question for purposes of internal analysis but do not rely on it in any substantive way. We are more likley to rely on poll respondents' self reported party identification or political ideology when it comes to looking at differences between political groups. Thank you for being such a careful reader of The New York Times and for your interest in The New York Times/CBS News Poll.

Sincerely,

Janet Elder

Editor

News Surveys and Election Analysis

The New York Times